<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Posture Release Imagery</title>
	<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org</link>
	<description>Developed by John Appleton, teacher of the ALEXANDER TECHNIQUE, Springfield, Missouri, USA</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can NON-awareness and LACK OF control be good for you ? by John</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/274#comment-2308</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/274#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Pete,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You ask good questions. Maybe too good, since I am not sure I have the answers... yet. This "image of motor segment only" exercise does seem to fit in with core stability. I think that since the director and motor segments are imagined NOT to exist, it has the effect of not only eliminating some miscontrol by those segments but also it perhaps makes the motor segment seem bigger. Being bigger, it would be sensed as more stable, I think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the question about the heal, I must admit I hadn't clarified that issue. Images tend to work even when they are not precisely worked out... of which this is an example. But I have been working with your question here and have the answer (which involves changing my drawing a bit when I get to it. The appropriate split between the motor and rudder segments is through the third toe and not back through the heal but rather turned inward toward the instep. Then the split returns to the center to the ventral part of the back of the calf. See the illustration of the foot and heal in the dorsal-ventral evolution drawing on the homepage,&lt;br /&gt;
http://posturereleaseimagery.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/background-hill-with-evo4.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
As I stated, I am a more uncertain about this image than others so let me know what you discover or learn from experimentation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pete,</p>
<p>You ask good questions. Maybe too good, since I am not sure I have the answers&#8230; yet. This &#8220;image of motor segment only&#8221; exercise does seem to fit in with core stability. I think that since the director and motor segments are imagined NOT to exist, it has the effect of not only eliminating some miscontrol by those segments but also it perhaps makes the motor segment seem bigger. Being bigger, it would be sensed as more stable, I think.</p>
<p>As for the question about the heal, I must admit I hadn&#8217;t clarified that issue. Images tend to work even when they are not precisely worked out&#8230; of which this is an example. But I have been working with your question here and have the answer (which involves changing my drawing a bit when I get to it. The appropriate split between the motor and rudder segments is through the third toe and not back through the heal but rather turned inward toward the instep. Then the split returns to the center to the ventral part of the back of the calf. See the illustration of the foot and heal in the dorsal-ventral evolution drawing on the homepage,<br />
<a href="http://posturereleaseimagery.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/background-hill-with-evo4.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://posturereleaseimagery.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/background-hill-with-evo4.JPG</a><br />
As I stated, I am a more uncertain about this image than others so let me know what you discover or learn from experimentation.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can NON-awareness and LACK OF control be good for you ? by Pete</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/274#comment-2300</link>
		<author>Pete</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/274#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>Hey John,
Wondering how you see this fits in with core stability, like in your previous blog posting?

Also a question for the more human depiction of the d/m/r splits above, do you also split off the heel as part of the rudder segment? (you have it depicted above as part of the motor segment, AND the rudder segment, I think) Which would mean the heel to disappear as well?
That's it for now I think :)
Take care,
Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John,<br />
Wondering how you see this fits in with core stability, like in your previous blog posting?</p>
<p>Also a question for the more human depiction of the d/m/r splits above, do you also split off the heel as part of the rudder segment? (you have it depicted above as part of the motor segment, AND the rudder segment, I think) Which would mean the heel to disappear as well?<br />
That&#8217;s it for now I think <img src='http://posturereleaseimagery.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Take care,<br />
Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Core Stability&#8221; - from my point of view by John</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/270#comment-2180</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/270#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rita,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comments. Keep on exploring to see what works for you and what you learn. Also, feel free to ask here or email me privately with any comments or questions that might come up. My drawings aren't perfect nor are my imagery directions. So miscommunication can occur.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
John&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rita,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. Keep on exploring to see what works for you and what you learn. Also, feel free to ask here or email me privately with any comments or questions that might come up. My drawings aren&#8217;t perfect nor are my imagery directions. So miscommunication can occur.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Core Stability&#8221; - from my point of view by Rita</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/270#comment-2178</link>
		<author>Rita</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 22:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/270#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi John,have just come across your PRI web page, what a revelation. I did your lamb and egg exercise in a meditation. and ended up being the lamb, protecting an egg, and also being the egg and feeling safe in the arms of life. It was awesome for me, as I have an anxiety problem. Also the exercise of moving my body in one direction while thinking the opposite, helped me enormously. Thank youx&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,have just come across your PRI web page, what a revelation. I did your lamb and egg exercise in a meditation. and ended up being the lamb, protecting an egg, and also being the egg and feeling safe in the arms of life. It was awesome for me, as I have an anxiety problem. Also the exercise of moving my body in one direction while thinking the opposite, helped me enormously. Thank youx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dorsal-ventral types - made more complicated by John</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/248#comment-1748</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/248#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>Hi "mang,"

You ask a good question. I hope this short answer helps. 

Since the 3rd row is a top view, you do not see the side view, which would show the dorsal-ventral waves, you are only seeing the lateral influences that the types would display. Since I do not have state-of-the-art three dimensional drawings to show, my drawing here is misleading. I may remove the lateral segment until I can show it more clearly. For the meantime, just look at rows 2 and 4 for a sense of differences on each side of each type.

Thanks for the sharp eye.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8220;mang,&#8221;</p>
<p>You ask a good question. I hope this short answer helps. </p>
<p>Since the 3rd row is a top view, you do not see the side view, which would show the dorsal-ventral waves, you are only seeing the lateral influences that the types would display. Since I do not have state-of-the-art three dimensional drawings to show, my drawing here is misleading. I may remove the lateral segment until I can show it more clearly. For the meantime, just look at rows 2 and 4 for a sense of differences on each side of each type.</p>
<p>Thanks for the sharp eye.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dorsal-ventral types - made more complicated by Pete</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/248#comment-1746</link>
		<author>Pete</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/248#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>Hey John,
I'm noticing in the top-view, row 3, column 1 (blue type), perhaps that image is incorrect?
Seems the right/red side of the body might be more stretched out than the left side. Or in other words, the limbs are closer together on the right side than the left, and I would have thought the opposite would be true for the blue type. Specially after looking at the 4th row, first blue type...that character's left side is the yellow type (standing, chillin), and right "half type" is the red type (jumping, mid-air)....

am I seeing the lateral wave incorrectly?
Cheers mang</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John,<br />
I&#8217;m noticing in the top-view, row 3, column 1 (blue type), perhaps that image is incorrect?<br />
Seems the right/red side of the body might be more stretched out than the left side. Or in other words, the limbs are closer together on the right side than the left, and I would have thought the opposite would be true for the blue type. Specially after looking at the 4th row, first blue type&#8230;that character&#8217;s left side is the yellow type (standing, chillin), and right &#8220;half type&#8221; is the red type (jumping, mid-air)&#8230;.</p>
<p>am I seeing the lateral wave incorrectly?<br />
Cheers mang</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Core Stability&#8221; - from my point of view by John</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/270#comment-1490</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/270#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>Below I have attached part of an email I received with some comments and suggestion from a reader who prefered to indirectly post them:

G'day John,

I often stop by your web site to remind myself of your imagery techniques and ideas - and I would post a comment on your blog if I wasn't so paranoid about internet security. However, apart from wishing to thank you for a very informative and helpful site, I wanted to comment on your recent post, 'Core Stability...'

I found the principle of moving a body part in one direction while thinking in the other quite easy to grasp with some, almost immediate, sense of release... especially in the neck area (tipping the head down while imagining it tilted up). I was quite easily able to transfer this imagery to all my moving parts with some success... eyes looking left while thinking them right; arms held high, while imaging them flopped down etc. I was able to feel a whole lower body release-and-tense sensation while imagining my legs swinging as if on a playground swing while sitting still. Perhaps these suggestions might be useful to others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below I have attached part of an email I received with some comments and suggestion from a reader who prefered to indirectly post them:</p>
<p>G&#8217;day John,</p>
<p>I often stop by your web site to remind myself of your imagery techniques and ideas - and I would post a comment on your blog if I wasn&#8217;t so paranoid about internet security. However, apart from wishing to thank you for a very informative and helpful site, I wanted to comment on your recent post, &#8216;Core Stability&#8230;&#8217;</p>
<p>I found the principle of moving a body part in one direction while thinking in the other quite easy to grasp with some, almost immediate, sense of release&#8230; especially in the neck area (tipping the head down while imagining it tilted up). I was quite easily able to transfer this imagery to all my moving parts with some success&#8230; eyes looking left while thinking them right; arms held high, while imaging them flopped down etc. I was able to feel a whole lower body release-and-tense sensation while imagining my legs swinging as if on a playground swing while sitting still. Perhaps these suggestions might be useful to others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems imagining? by John</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/232#comment-1291</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/232#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mary,&lt;br /&gt;
There are more than several teachers of the Alexander Technique in Portland. I am not sure which ones are familiar with my Posture Release Imagery. If you send your email address to appleton.john(AT)yahoo(dot)com, I can probably send you more information in a couple of days. There are non-Alexander Technique people in Portland who use my imagery, but they are not "trained" by me but could discuss things with you though not technically teach you. And, of course, you can email me with more extensive questions. I'm happy to chat with anyone interested. Best, John&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mary,<br />
There are more than several teachers of the Alexander Technique in Portland. I am not sure which ones are familiar with my Posture Release Imagery. If you send your email address to appleton.john(AT)yahoo(dot)com, I can probably send you more information in a couple of days. There are non-Alexander Technique people in Portland who use my imagery, but they are not &#8220;trained&#8221; by me but could discuss things with you though not technically teach you. And, of course, you can email me with more extensive questions. I&#8217;m happy to chat with anyone interested. Best, John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems imagining? by Mary</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/232#comment-1289</link>
		<author>Mary</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/232#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>Is there anyone in Portland Oregon that teaches the PRL technique?  If so, please give me their address and phone #. Thanks, Mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anyone in Portland Oregon that teaches the PRL technique?  If so, please give me their address and phone #. Thanks, Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dorsal-ventral types - made more complicated by John</title>
		<link>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/248#comment-1258</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://posturereleaseimagery.org/archives/248#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Marie and Pete,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks to you both. Pete has communicated with me by means of one of my email addresses, alextec_swmo(AT)hotmail(dot)com, as well as by different chat lines and Skype. Anyone else can do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers, John&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marie and Pete,</p>
<p>Thanks to you both. Pete has communicated with me by means of one of my email addresses, alextec_swmo(AT)hotmail(dot)com, as well as by different chat lines and Skype. Anyone else can do the same.</p>
<p>Cheers, John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
